Can someone explain why they lynch a confirmed townie?
My game had 2. I’m really getting used to it.i really hate self hammers.
She was confirmed by a hider. He was neutral but he didn't need to lie.
And a confirmation should be way more important that her lies.
It's like they are not even thinking.
I'm repeating myself, but it also looks pretty bad if she took down a townie who happened to have her name with her.. On the topic of play, Nicole shouldn’t have backed down from the claim. Especially given there’s only so many players she could have thought were scum at that point with Brazil being a clear suspect. RIP Town, at least I got what I wanted lol
There is a big difference between Kyan and Nicole: one had another player backing her up.
And town already had an investigative role in DCPat and an unclaimed 1-shot cop in GoG.
Sure, but to go with that she has to believe Brazil is town and if she does then who is scum?I'm repeating myself, but it also looks pretty bad if she took down a townie who happened to have her name with her.
This is a very common pattern. Focus on the most visible players. It's not on purpose of course, but it happens a lot if you're not careful. That's partly why I played so passively trying to counter the meta and never really mentioning my scum mates to keep the attention on townies.I mean she did do well, mostly. Just more I can see the reasons for lynching her.
Gotham and Stan according to her I think.Sure, but to go with that she has to believe Brazil is town and if she does then who is scum?
Block is quite powerful with few scum remaining and decent reads. That's why town with jailor is usually countered with scum strongman because it can be so powerful late game. Mafiascum has a section about avoiding tracker+jailor because it's really powerful with only one scum alive.DCPat's role was passive and as much chance of outing a PR than scum.
GoG's block is an extremely weak cop check in that she needs to hit the exact scum that shoots or it does nothing.
Kyan's claim was solid and at that point he really was as much a verified Town as Nicole.
I'm not saying this game had that as both are limited shot and unlikely to be in play in late game.Mafiascum has a section about avoiding tracker+jailor because it's really powerful with only one scum alive.
I'm being especially cryptic, but when everybody is suspicious and you're not cooperating with anyone the waters are much muddier and scum has much more leverage to steer the lynch.Also, town reads and town circle <3
I think Brazil needs a bit of praise. That was a pretty good move and with Nicole not really suspecting him he is probably not going to be a prime suspect tomorrow.Paranoia
Finally caught up. Wow, that sure was something.
1. I can see how using private information that is outside of the game is a grey area. I think I would’ve been fine with whatever way the modkills did (or didn’t) go.
2. Props to Monkey and Cabot for handling a shitty situation well. You did the best you could given everything.
3. Whining about mentions of GAF was one of the lower moments I’ve seen in our games (which is saying something since I’ve made multiple people so mad they considered quitting playing). That it came from an admin is even worse. Trying to classify that as being an “internet detective” was a huge reach and far bigger of a derail than anything else in that whole exchange. Pinging another person to come in and reinforce her will as well, yikes.
4. On the topic of play, Nicole shouldn’t have backed down from the claim. Especially given there’s only so many players she could have thought were scum at that point with Brazil being a clear suspect. RIP Town, at least I got what I wanted lol
I'm really surprised how little pressure Swamped was under in this phase.
That self hammer, oh well.
She was confirmed by a hider. He was neutral but he didn't need to lie.
And a confirmation should be way more important that her lies.
It's like they are not even thinking.
Mason bae <3Lying is bad kids. I would never do that in a game of mafia.
Lying is bad kids. I would never do that in a game of mafia.
just the latest in a series of bad lynches!ding ding ding
"town hooker"Lying is bad kids. I would never do that in a game of mafia.
"town hooker"
When it comes to moderation decisions on ResetEra, no one acts as one. No moderation decision, from a warning to a ban, is made in isolation. There were multiple people consulted on the possible encroachment, including Grizzly and Hecht. Brazil and myself both agreed that things had gone a step too far, and there was a course correction needed. We unanimously agreed that a modpost was in the best interests of the thread. I should have informed the game runners about the decision prior. I have apologized to Monkey and Cabot already, and ResetEra staff will ensure that game runners are informed before action is taken in the future. The discussion of the modpost in the game thread was intended to hopefully nip the conversation in the butt in a fast moving game while site staff had a chance to discuss. In hindsight, game runners should have been consulted to pause the game first. To emphasize, talking about things such as the old mafia games and that they were on GAF is fine on ResetEra. Talking about old bans and other such things are not. If you have questions, feel free to ask. Grizzly, Hecht, and myself are happy to answer them. I'd include Brazil too, but I think he still has some town to kill. Thanks.
Obviously we can't go back in time and fix that, but we've discussed how to go about this in the future (PMing the gamerunners rather than posting in the thread)The mod post for a rules reminder isn't the issue.
Posting in the game thread and trying to assert your mod powers to have a player killed, who you were heavily scum reading btw, was not a good look.
The mod post for a rules reminder isn't the issue.
Posting in the game thread and trying to assert your mod powers to have a player killed, who you were heavily scum reading btw, was not a good look.
so when Sorian doesn't lie... :thinking:twitch
You brought it up in the thread though when it clearly had no place in the game.There was no push from mod powers to have the player killed. I am and always will be an admin first and a player second. Obviously, there was a conflict of interest. That is why beyond determining that there was mod post needed, I nor Brazil was involved in the conversation on how to correct the game. I can assure you there was no behind the scenes conversations between myself and anyone else regarding who should or shouldn't be mod killed. I specifically bowed out of any such conversation, and any necessary input from ResetEra staff needed from the game runners came from Hecht and Grizzly.
For clarification purposes then - if I was talking to someone in the general Mafia thread about a game we were planning last year, to which they asked “hey do you remember what theme ideas we were discussing originally? I went to check and noticed we were both banned” you all would’ve swooped in just as quickly? Because the conversation was never explicitly about GAF nor was it about the reasons, events, etc. behind a ban. It was simply “he cannot check PMs due to being banned”.It wasn't mentions of GAF. And to be clear, there were conversations with other admins and moderators prior to taking action. We have clear rules. You can't start trying to dig up where someone was or wasn't banned on another site, etc. Saying, "hey I played that game on GAF" is fine, etc. it's the ban discussion that started crossing the line.
You brought it up in the thread though when it clearly had no place in the game.
I'm curious what rule(s) was/were being broken. The FAQ didn't seem to cover it and it looks like it didn't have much to do with GAF in specific.
As I understand it, it was using info about Blarg from another place - his ban on GAF - that was the issue. So even if it wasn't GAF but was, say, "oh, you must be lying, you said X on your blog that I found" would be out of bounds for similar reasons, because it veers toward internet detective work. Please correct if wrong, however.
I feel like melon was less and less proactive the more town confirmed she was.
I still think the best play for confirmed players is to take the lead and drive discussion with all players, because everyone has to trust you (if town).
She did the opposite of what I would've hoped for.
hence the cascade of modkills.Well in the scope of the games, PMs should be off limits anyway.
GoG's block is an extremely weak cop check in that she needs to hit the exact scum that shoots or it does nothing.
Didn't GoG had an aligment check that she used on DCPat D1?
With regards to what happened with Nicole/RE staff, I’ll say my peace in the main thread when the game is over, I only had a problem with demanding a modkill in game, though i didn’t feel it was enough to modkill, despite how tempted I was.
:P to be fair I was scum and only did it so I could frame turmoil. Also thanks for clarifying the whole Gaf thing.It's the Geno way.
Garlok
Garlock
Garlock
Gorlka
Garlock
And you didn't know that when you killed Kyan so don't try and retroactively justify your bad read.
Two scum left.
On another completely different note:
@SweetNicole
That (likely) typo Gorlka made me laugh, I like it ;)
No worries.I didn't realize it until last night when I was making that meme that I had been spelling it wrong lol
I went to tag him and it didn't work in preview, so I was like...oh I've been spelling it wrong :(
But the topic Cabot is referring to is an admin’s actions in the game (i.e. seeking a modkill of a fellow player) not an actual ResetERA moderation action (such as a warning or ban). I see no reason we shouldn’t be able to discuss what occurred outside of the “internet detective” bit and the follow-up warning.Discussing the moderation of ResetEra on ResetEra derails threads and is against the FAQ. Please PM a moderator or an admin on ResetEra if you have any issues with ResetEra moderation, as public discussions will derail a thread and we will end up locking it. Discussion that takes place with regards to moderation on ResetEra is fine in Outer Mafia and Discord Server as they aren't part of ResetEra, and thus the site rules are not applicable.
We'll have a review thread and we'll get down to it. Her actions were not intentional, and I'm aware that the perception isn't great. I think we've got a good understanding of how to address it in the future.But the topic Cabot is referring to is an admin’s actions in the game (i.e. seeking a modkill of a fellow player) not an actual ResetERA moderation action (such as a warning or ban). I see no reason we shouldn’t be able to discuss what occurred outside of the “internet detective” bit and the follow-up warning.
I do agree what was discussed in here already will be a better approach. Just trying to clarify what is and isn’t fair game to discuss in the review thread without getting banned lolWe'll have a review thread and we'll get down to it. Her actions were not intentional, and I'm aware that the perception isn't great. I think we've got a good understanding of how to address it in the future.
No worries.
And that pic was gold. But I would've mainly contributed to mislynches (Kyan, turmoil) Being on a high horse in the spec thread is easy. But I feel Fran... and I know the paranoid, stubborn me good enough. So if I'm honest, I would've probably lynched Kyan too. In the heat of the fight it's hard to take a step back.
Yeah, sticking to the claim would have been the better play. Even if you leaned town on Brazil you had no alignment confirmation, meanwhile you did know your alignment. Ultimately town will always be eager to lynch a liar because it’s the easiest case to make outside of an actual red check or seeing seeing someone visit the NK target. Your heart was in the right place but you underestimated town’s laziness lolYeah. I probably would have voted for him if I didn't think Stanley was acting strange.
I honestly wonder if I should have just stuck with my claim through and through and gotten Brazil lynched.
I really did think about it, but on the off chance he was town, it would have certainly destroyed town chances of winning. Knowing he was scum though, if I had a stronger read on his scumness, I would have pushed back harder.
Given that I had LP confirm town, I feel like I could have maybe won a vote off between Brazil and I. IDK
Right now we're considering having the review thread here so that we can discuss the matter freely.I do agree what was discussed in here already will be a better approach. Just trying to clarify what is and isn’t fair game to discuss in the review thread without getting banned lol
Got it, makes sense. Thanks for all the responses. I’ll leave it alone until review time.Right now we're considering having the review thread here so that we can discuss the matter freely.
No. Mafia constitution :DI'm looking forward to the review thread so we can hammer out some new limits and boundaries. Our rules should be living guidelines and shift as we shift, through location, expectation, and more.
Went wrong obviously.suddenly sent wrong
Our rules should be living guidelines and shift as we shift, through location, expectation, and more.
This is a fair point. It's not the first time we've had people post their role pm without realising it's wrong.(honestly for silly people like me it would be nice to add it and avoid future issues).
This is a fair point. It's not the first time we've had people post their role pm without realising it's wrong.
As for advice, I'd really recommend taking a side at day end if your preferred candidate isn't a realistic lynch option. It's fine to make it clear who you really want lynched, but that shouldn't prevent you from having a say in who is actually lynched.
And besides, the more townies voting, the harder it is for scum to control the vote!
Write less novels.
If you've got a super long post brewing, break it up into smaller chunks and hammer the points you're making.Try to get your points across in a flowing exchange than putting all your thoughts in a massive post. You will get better interaction from other players and this usually helps to reform opinions in your own head as well.
The painful truth is that most people don't really read megaposts.
Awe how cute, she thinks it’s just Cabot.I write megaposts. cabot ignores me. :(
I write megaposts. cabot ignores me. :(
One thing is to follow where the game seems to be going and look up people that are being discussed a lot. I've burned myself here in the past by not following the discussion and being totally blind at the day end.What do you do when you have no read of the persons nominated? Like if they are null to you? I was scared to stray away from my reads and mislynch people without any reason for it and get called out afterwards and mislynched because of it.
Adding to this you can still make mega posts, but it really helps to have a tldr or otherwise structure so it can easily be skimmed (people often skim to catch up) and in other posts start hammering your main arguments either in direct replies or because people aren't listening.Write less novels.
If you've got a super long post brewing, break it up into smaller chunks and hammer the points you're making.Try to get your points across in a flowing exchange than putting all your thoughts in a massive post. You will get better interaction from other players and this usually helps to reform opinions in your own head as well.
The painful truth is that most people don't really read megaposts.
You're not the first. There was one high profile scum modkill and I think I've seen that rule in big read text some places lolThis silly girl says hi! You guys... I was so embarrassed for posting my role PM, I was blushing for hours and I am not the blushing kind. I didn't understand the rule 3 as it was, I thought my own role didn't apply to it as it was part of the game and didn't involve outside infos (honestly for silly people like me it would be nice to add it and avoid future issues).
Like Ty said, ideally you would look at who is likely to be a candidate at day end and try to form an opinion about them in advance. Sometimes you will townread both and that just kinda sucks, but it's still best to vote for whichever you think you are more likely to be wrong about.What do you do when you have no read of the persons nominated? Like if they are null to you? I was scared to stray away from my reads and mislynch people without any reason for it and get called out afterwards and mislynched because of it.
Do the last minutes trains always happen in this game? Or usually people already have their candidates without changes?
Yes, you are right and add to it that is super exhausting to do as well! "tl;dr" was created for a reason and I should have known better.
Thank you both for the tips!! I appreciate them :)
One thing is to follow where the game seems to be going and look up people that are being discussed a lot. I've burned myself here in the past by not following the discussion and being totally blind at the day end.
If there are two people you have no opinion of at lynch best bet is to read those over really quickly and go for the one you prefer, however slightly. If you find both very town or whatever this could be the time to push other lynches you're more interested in.
Adding to this you can still make mega posts, but it really helps to have a tldr or otherwise structure so it can easily be skimmed (people often skim to catch up) and in other posts start hammering your main arguments either in direct replies or because people aren't listening.
And if you can't decide between the candidates, you could also look at who is pushing for them to be lynched. Maybe the people you trust/suspect all prefer one option etc. Maybe one option was discussed a lot more than the other, making their flip (even if town) more useful than the other.
Oh yeah and one other thing:
Never ever self vote ^^
(as town)
You're voting for probably the only person you know for a fact is town. I've seen people do it to convince people of their innocence (never works) or out of frustration (understandable sometimes but you have to remember it's a team game), I've never seen it used for a good reason and have the desired outcome.I never thought of it! Why didn't I think of it?!!! Basically go against the people who I scum votes. Yep, this is definitely reasonable and easily applicable if I am at my wits ends.
Why not?