Game Thread Game thread

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Would Nomad still get his result after being robbed?

Now we have our first real problem because I'm also ordinary villager. But I don't know why Exmachina lied, because Rynam claimed exmachina was switched with a possible Tanner Faddy. I'm confused unless they are both bad guys.
So one is lying.

Really it sounds like Exmach is lying because Ry could have easily lied about his switch. I don't see you lying.

Am I supposed to know if my role has been swapped? I didn’t receive any notification, so as far as I know, I’m still a villager.
No, you receive no notification. The only person who gets to double check their card is the Insomniac.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
1. [f] Include
2. [m] DCPat - Ordinary (conflicts with Exmac)
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber, Stole Nomad
5. [m] nin (nin1000)
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Not Insomniac, robbed
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - ?
10. [f] Sawneeks - Knows a Role
11. [m] ynnek7 - ?
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now ??
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Oh right, also Nin is Revealer. >.>

At the moment I'd vote for Faddy. Exmach seems like the liar out of the two Villagers due to the hesitance to claim leading me to believe he is lying about his role in the off chance Ry didn't switch him.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
By the way I'm the Witch.

I gave Card 2 to Nicole. It's why I called her out. Nicole what were you?
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
By the way I'm the Witch.

I gave Card 2 to Nicole. It's why I called her out. Nicole what were you?
Well that was obvious. Nicole isn't the Robber so she must have been the drunk originally.

So she is definitely an unknown centre card.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Well that was obvious. Nicole isn't the Robber so she must have been the drunk originally.

So she is definitely an unknown centre card.
Yup! And I mean, Isaac claimed Robber.

I do know what card I gave her. Holding on to that for a bit until more folks claim in case someone is lying.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Isaac isn't the Robber.
I'm the robber and I stole DCPat's Tanner card.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Part of me doesn't believe you Faddy

sorry :<
I don't believe you either. Why are you asking Nicole what she was when she already claimed? And you are the only person who knows what her role actually is.

it is a neat little loop. And you have been softing that witch claim for a while.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
I don't believe you either. Why are you asking Nicole what she was when she already claimed? And you are the only person who knows what her role actually is.

it is a neat little loop. And you have been softing that witch claim for a while.
Because she did not claim Drunk until after I asked. Technically she never even said it, she simply didn't disagree with what these two brought up:

So SweetNicole either was, or became, the drunk.
Sawneeks is a revealer
Sweet Nicole is the Drunk
Am Townie

anyone else wanna claim stuff?
It's a convenient 'claim' she didn't even initiate herself but simply adopted what others said.

Also I hopefully won't be. We still have an Apprentice Seer hopefully somewhere who can help out.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
We are not counting the gif post as confirmation. I mean what else is she claiming.

And at the time Sawneeks you two seemed very friendly about her gif play.
 
By the way I'm the Witch.

I gave Card 2 to Nicole. It's why I called her out. Nicole what were you?
Interesting.

You see I'm the Apprentice Seer and I chose to check card 2 as well, so if you indeed gave it to Nicole like you claimed you would have known she isn't a wolf now so why did you imply otherwise?
 
Apprentice Seer (Include)->Card 2

Drunk (Nicole)->Swap: Card 2->Nicole: ??? / Card 2: Drunk

Witch (Sawneeks): Look: Card 2->Swap: Nicole->Nicole: Drunk / Card 2: ???

I was the drunk, now I am the drunk again.
Whatever was Card 2 that Include looked at is still in the center, then, assuming y'all are being truthful about your roles and which cards you checked.

 

Ynnek7

OH MY GOD, THEY LYNCHED YNNEK
I'm glad I waited to claim until now, since I'm actually the Apprentice Seer, too.

I checked card 3, though.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
We are not counting the gif post as confirmation. I mean what else is she claiming.

And at the time Sawneeks you two seemed very friendly about her gif play.
I liked her gifs. :<

And she never actually said she was the Drunk outside of gifs until just now.

Interesting.

You see I'm the Apprentice Seer and I chose to check card 2 as well, so if you indeed gave it to Nicole like you claimed you would have known she isn't a wolf now so why did you imply otherwise?
Interesting, everyone seems to like Card 2.

Also because I didn't give it to Nicole.

There aren't duplicates of roles though...

Right?
Nope! Only 1 per.
 
I liked her gifs. :<

And she never actually said she was the Drunk outside of gifs until just now.



Interesting, everyone seems to like Card 2.

Also because I didn't give it to Nicole.



Nope! Only 1 per.
You didn't huh? That's contradict what you have been claiming so far, so why are you lying my dear Saw?I can only see one explanation... Nice attempt to frame Nicole though, too bad it didn't work out.
 
You didn't huh? That's contradict what you have been claiming so far, so why are you lying my dear Saw?I can only see one explanation... Nice attempt to frame Nicole though, too bad it didn't work out.
She was trying to get me to claim if I was drunk before or after since card 2 was drunk when she checked it
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
@Sawneeks who did you give it to?

Also that would mean include knows my role which is apparently not wolf
Actually given the order of how Roles work in the OP Include knows what Role I gave to [redacted]. You have whatever [redacted] was.

But i'ma hold on to that for a bit. Thanks for finally fully claiming though. :p
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Also, the Mystic Wolf acts as a mini-Seer. Include/Ynnek technically could not be lying with their check of a center card, just with their reasons for doing so.

Why would I lie about it in the first place? I had no reason or incentive to do so. However I gotta stop Sawneeks from her attempt to frame you.
I wasn't framing her, I was trying to get a full claim out of her so we'd know what she was before i 'switched' her with a center card.
 
So card 2 - > checked by include - > swapped by saw with someone else role - > swapped with me

If I am tracking everything correctly.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
So card 2 - > checked by include - > swapped by saw with someone else role - > swapped with me

If I am tracking everything correctly.
That's correct. Include acts first to check the card, I act second to check the card and then give it to someone, that someone's card was put in Card 2's place which you drunkenly took.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Calling it now:
  • Saw will reveal who she swapped
  • Swapped player will say they were the wolf
  • Try to frame me
I'm onto y'all

Nope because Sawneeks swapped card 2 with exmachina. Who then got swapped with me.

Assuming Rynam is telling the truth.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
This scenario of my framing Nicole doesn't work. I can confirm what Card 2 is. Unless Include and I are Scum working together and just got lucky without being counterclaimed twice I can not be Scum while she is Town. I can't guess correctly what Card 2 was.

Nope because Sawneeks swapped card 2 with exmachina. Who then got swapped with me.

Assuming Rynam is telling the truth.
Close, but nope.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
This scenario of my framing Nicole doesn't work. I can confirm what Card 2 is. Unless Include and I are Scum working together and just got lucky without being counterclaimed twice I can not be Scum while she is Town. I can't guess correctly what Card 2 was.


Close, but nope.
You have been counterclaimed once. Maybe Ynnek7 is the real seer.
 

Ynnek7

OH MY GOD, THEY LYNCHED YNNEK
I'm not sure what the motives are yet for any of this, but unless I'm really unlucky I can confirm what card 3 is.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
1. [f] Include - Seer (conflicts with Ynnek)
2. [m] DCPat - Villager (conflicts with Exmac)
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber (Conflicts with Faddy), Stole Nomad
5. [m] nin (nin1000) - Revealer. Forgot action.
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/Robber (conflicts with Isaac)/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Not Insomniac, robbed
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - Drunk, Now Card 2
10. [f] Sawneeks - Witch / Check Card 2 and gave it to ???
11. [m] ynnek7 - Seer (conflicts with Include)
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now ??
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
In the scenario where you and Include give mutual confirmation, one of you has been counterclaimed.
Uh, no? Witch can check a Card and give it to someone. Apprentice Seer can check a center Card. They are separate roles that do not conflict with each other.
 
This scenario of my framing Nicole doesn't work. I can confirm what Card 2 is. Unless Include and I are Scum working together and just got lucky without being counterclaimed twice I can not be Scum while she is Town. I can't guess correctly what Card 2 was.


Close, but nope.
So why did you imply she is a wolf? Why keep on pressuring her and implying you know her role now? I mean it's easy to look up and see how you were putting on the work for your awesome reveal.

You used to be more subtle Saw, I'm kinda disappointed.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
So why did you imply she is a wolf? Why keep on pressuring her and implying you know her role now? I mean it's easy to look up and see how you were putting on the work for your awesome reveal.

You used to be more subtle Saw, I'm kinda disappointed.
I implied she was a wolf because A) she had yet to post and wanted to get her in here with a ping and B) it was a perfect opportunity to take LP's joke and pressure someone. Scum don't know how to take a joke and will deflect instead of answer properly. I was not satisfied with her gif response and pushed her further.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Uh, no? Witch can check a Card and give it to someone. Apprentice Seer can check a center Card. They are separate roles that do not conflict with each other.
Look at what you said

This scenario of my framing Nicole doesn't work. I can confirm what Card 2 is. Unless Include and I are Scum working together and just got lucky without being counterclaimed twice I can not be Scum while she is Town. I can't guess correctly what Card 2 was.


Close, but nope.
You and Include could both be on the wolf team. Or you could be a wolf waiting for Incude to say what card 2 is first.
 
Or you could be a wolf waiting for Incude to say what card 2 is first.
Have you seen Ynnek7 coming to the rescue after I called her out? I mean at this point they cannot be more caught than what they already are. Guess they had no choice but try to discredit me to save face and switch their target from Nicole to me.

Kinda boring at this point though.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Look at what you said



You and Include could both be on the wolf team. Or you could be a wolf waiting for Incude to say what card 2 is first.
And by that I meant this:

In the scenario where both Include and I are Wolves we would have to each claim a FAKE role and hope each of us don't get counterclaimed. Include is counterclaimed by Ynnek as Seer, I have yet to be counterclaimed as Witch. The risk of that is FAR too high without proper communication to be worth lying about. There is a Scenario here with Include being a Wolf and myself being Town, or vice versa, but we could not both be Woofs.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Have you seen Ynnek7 coming to the rescue after I called her out? I mean at this point they cannot be more caught than what they already are. Guess they had no choice but try to discredit me to save face and switch their target from Nicole to me.

Kinda boring at this point though.
Depending on Ynnek's answer I'm starting to believe you're lying.
 
I implied she was a wolf because A) she had yet to post and wanted to get her in here with a ping and B) it was a perfect opportunity to take LP's joke and pressure someone. Scum don't know how to take a joke and will deflect instead of answer properly. I was not satisfied with her gif response and pushed her further.
Playing town two times in row made you rusty Saw, you can't keep your story straight anymore. Sad.
 

Ynnek7

OH MY GOD, THEY LYNCHED YNNEK
Eh, confirm is probably too strong of a word, but it's the best I got.

Someone out here is hopefully a Mason wondering where their partner is.
 
And where am I doubling back and tripping over my own words?

come on include. you're better than this.
This kind of rhetoric only work if you are Sorian but you are not. I'm sad to see that you went this low Saw but hey you gotta try and save face I suppose.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
This kind of rhetoric only work if you are Sorian but you are not. I'm sad to see that you went this low Saw but hey you gotta try and save face I suppose.
also you were the one who accused me of doubling back on what I said. I'm asking for clarification on it, don't deflect.
 
Include, what is Card 2
I will reveal it when the time comes. Why are you asking me though? I thought you already knew and it was supposed to be Nicole's in your grand scheme but then plot twist after I called you out it became mine and a sudden fake Seer appears. Shockers.
 
Please, you're deflecting.

Ignoring my question isn't helping either.
Anyone with two eyes to read already knew my opinion and the basis of my accusations and so on and forth, trying to be pretend it ain't so doesn't make it so.

Try again please.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Using ''big words'', discrediting...etc. I guess desperate times calls for desperate actions huh Saw?
This feels pretty overt. I wouldn't be surprised if Ynnek7 was real and Include was the minion.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
I will reveal it when the time comes. Why are you asking me though? I thought you already knew and it was supposed to be Nicole's in your grand scheme but then plot twist after I called you out it became mine and a sudden fake Seer appears. Shockers.
Because you're buying time and lying, you have no clue what Card 2 is. What is Card 2.
 
This feels pretty overt. I wouldn't be surprised if Ynnek7 was real and Include was the minion.
So you see me as the desperate one in the story? Why would I be? Nicole was already poised to be Saw's target anyway, putting needless heat on myself if I was wolf doesn't make sense whatsoever.
 
And what is this 'when the time comes'? When is that?
Wait and see I suppose? Or are you the only one with the luxury to reveal when you want to? Because as I recall you kept the cliffhanger going since the game started, I feel empowered enough to do so as well.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Wait and see I suppose? Or are you the only one with the luxury to reveal when you want to? Because as I recall you kept the cliffhanger going since the game started, I feel empowered enough to do so as well.
Let me put it this way. I'm not claiming before you do because I think you're lying and it's easy enough for you to wait and just copy what I say. You seem to be doing the same for me. One of us is going to have to move first.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Setting aside Include for a sec, we do still have other counterclaims.

1. [f] Include - Seer (conflicts with Ynnek)
2. [m] DCPat - Villager (conflicts with Exmac)
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber (Conflicts with Faddy), Stole Nomad
5. [m] nin (nin1000) - Revealer. Forgot action.
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/Robber (conflicts with Isaac)/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Not Insomniac, robbed
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - Drunk, Now Card 2
10. [f] Sawneeks - Witch / Check Card 2 and gave it to ???
11. [m] ynnek7 - Seer (conflicts with Include)
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now ??

Counterclaims:
Seer: Ynnek and Include
Villager: DCPat and Exmachina
Robber: Isaac and Faddy

Though I'm inclined to believe Faddy is flailing because he is Tanner now. The other two are still question marks.
 
Let me put it this way. I'm not claiming before you do because I think you're lying and it's easy enough for you to wait and just copy what I say. You seem to be doing the same for me. One of us is going to have to move first.
How funny! You think I'm waiting for your? If I was I would have just coasted until the day ends to claim in the first place but hey I gotta put an end to your lies from the get go and get your scummates to come to your rescue.

I'm glad you found a justification of not ''revealing''.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Setting aside Include for a sec, we do still have other counterclaims.

1. [f] Include - Seer (conflicts with Ynnek)
2. [m] DCPat - Villager (conflicts with Exmac)
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber (Conflicts with Faddy), Stole Nomad
5. [m] nin (nin1000) - Revealer. Forgot action.
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/Robber (conflicts with Isaac)/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Not Insomniac, robbed
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - Drunk, Now Card 2
10. [f] Sawneeks - Witch / Check Card 2 and gave it to ???
11. [m] ynnek7 - Seer (conflicts with Include)
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now ??

Counterclaims:
Seer: Ynnek and Include
Villager: DCPat and Exmachina
Robber: Isaac and Faddy

Though I'm inclined to believe Faddy is flailing because he is Tanner now
. The other two are still question marks.
So do you believe I am the robber and got Tanner or was I tanner from the start?
or exmachina is lying and I am now the Tanner or Rynam is lying and I am stuck with DCPat's Tanner card.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
How funny! You think I'm waiting for your? If I was I would have just coasted until the day ends to claim in the first place but hey I gotta put an end to your lies from the get go and get your scummates to come to your rescue.

I'm glad you found a justification of not ''revealing''.
I really should just stop engaging you at this point, this feels just purposeful.

Then if you aren't against it, what are you waiting for. Everyone has claimed.

So do you believe I am the robber and got Tanner or was I tanner from the start?
or exmachina is lying and I am now the Tanner or Rynam is lying and I am stuck with DCPat's Tanner card.
Oops, wait. I got that wrong. I believe Ry switched you and Exmachina, meaning Exmachina is now a Tanner. He is still being cagey so I'm wondering if he was a Woof and you caught on to that.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Oops, wait. I got that wrong. I believe Ry switched you and Exmachina, meaning Exmachina is now a Tanner. He is still being cagey so I'm wondering if he was a Woof and you caught on to that.
Exmachina could have been a wolf but I don't really see it because I know DCPat is lying. I mean both of them could just have used villager as a defacto safe claim to hide their wolfiness.
 
if you aren't against it, what are you waiting for. Everyone has claimed
Excuse me? Are you purposely being dense?

You seem really nervous Saw... So anxious to control the narrative you just can't accept not getting all the cards in hands to manipulate us at will. Sorry not falling for it.

You tried though I can give you that, sorry I spoiled your plans to frame Nicole.
 

Sawneeks

Queen Doppelpopolis
Exmachina could have been a wolf but I don't really see it because I know DCPat is lying. I mean both of them could just have used villager as a defacto safe claim to hide their wolfiness.
My issue with your Robber claim is this:

I'm the Robber. I robbed Comrade Sparkster of his role. He is not a baddie.
Why would exmachina lie though? I have his role now so it doesn't actually help him win. Maybe he got flustered by being outed as Tanner and wanted to make a low key claim but I don't really follow that logic.

You have been far too cagey to be vanilla and you have played before so I don't really believe your claim at all.
I am the Villager now unless Exmachina is lying which I think is unlikely
Exmachina is now the Tanner

DCPat or Exmachina lying isn't really dependent on Rynam or me.
Isaac isn't the Robber.
I'm the robber and I stole DCPat's Tanner card.
You give zero indication that Isaac is lying at all. Instead you continue down the path of Ry telling the truth and assuming you are whatever Exmachina was.

Your play here is weird. Considering there are now two scenarios with you being Tanner it's unlikely I'd vote for you unless we can get some other confirmation here.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
My issue with your Robber claim is this:


You give zero indication that Isaac is lying at all. Instead you continue down the path of Ry telling the truth and assuming you are whatever Exmachina was.

Your play here is weird. Considering there are now two scenarios with you being Tanner it's unlikely I'd vote for you unless we can get some other confirmation here.
Except when I did.

Isaac's Robber claim is slightly suspect in that Nomad already ruled out being the insomniac. So if Isaac is the mystic wolf he would know it is safe to claim robber against Nomad.

And then slow roll it by not immediately confirming Nomad's role. I suppose in that scenarion he could be the other wolf.

So Nomad don't role claim before Isaac.
I outright call Isaac a wolf.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Was your original role the Robber or did you get it afterwards? If the former, you're a liar. I was the Robber.
Yeah and you just happened to steal from the first person in the thread that claimed not to be the insomniac
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
I was PI at the time but apparently I've been robbed and what not so I actually have no idea whom I aligned with

still with town probably?
Were these your checks or just from claims in the thread?

Sawneeks is a revealer
Sweet Nicole is the Drunk
Am Townie

anyone else wanna claim stuff?
Sawneeks says she is the witch, so who did you actually check?
 
Exmachina could have been a wolf but I don't really see it because I know DCPat is lying. I mean both of them could just have used villager as a defacto safe claim to hide their wolfiness.
If you know I'm lying because you stole my Tanner card, you also know I'm not Wolf.

Just saying.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
If you know I'm lying because you stole my Tanner card, you also know I'm not Wolf.

Just saying.
You were projecting wolf though. Immediately counter claiming the villager and asking weird questions about the revealer. Waiting a long time to claim when you had no powers and no reason not to instantly tell the truth.
 
You were projecting wolf though. Immediately counter claiming the villager and asking weird questions about the revealer. Waiting a long time to claim when you had no powers and no reason not to instantly tell the truth.
It's not a weird question. Just a mechanic action and pointing out that nothing was revealed.

That's what a WOLF would say just keep the heat off them
My point still stands. Faddy thinks I'm wolf, even tho he claims to be robber and stole my card.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
It's not a weird question. Just a mechanic action and pointing out that nothing was revealed.



My point still stands. Faddy thinks I'm wolf, even tho he claims to be robber and stole my card.
No, I know you are the robber unless Sawneeks has done some shenanigans with you.