Game Thread Game thread

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Hm....fair enough. I'm just not reading 'I'm actually the Robber, he's lying' through all of that.

What a weird way to frame that. :x

Did you check anyone with your power last night?

Well if Rynam screws me over and reneges on his switch I need to keep my options open to win as Tanner. So I didn't hard claim early because confirming DCPat as having the robber card doesn't help me.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
1. [f] Include - Seer (conflicts with Ynnek) / looked at Card 2
2. [m] DCPat - Villager (conflicts with Exmac)
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber (Conflicts with Faddy), Stole Nomad
5. [m] nin (nin1000) - Revealer. Forgot action.
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner?
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/Robber (conflicts with Isaac)/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Paranormal Investigator / Robbed?
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - Drunk, Now Card 2
10. [f] Sawneeks - Witch / Check Card 2 and gave it to ???
11. [m] ynnek7 - Seer (conflicts with Include) / Checked Card 3 (Mason)
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now Insomniac

Changes to roles:
Rynam switched Faddy and Exmach.
Nicole took card 2
Sawneeks gave Card 2 to [redacted]
Either Isaac robbed Nomad (Robber -> PI) OR Faddy robbed DCPat (Robber -> Tanner)

Counterclaims:
Seer: Ynnek and Include
Villager: DCPat and Exmachina
Robber: Isaac and Faddy

We also need some clarifications from people who haven't shown back up yet.

I think we have Woofs in:
DCPat, Include, Isaac, Exmach, Faddy??, and Ynnek

There are also 3 Woofs, or 2 woofs and a Minion.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
1. [f] Include - Seer (conflicts with Ynnek) / looked at Card 2
2. [m] DCPat - Villager (conflicts with Exmac)
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber (Conflicts with Faddy), Stole Nomad
5. [m] nin (nin1000) - Revealer. Forgot action.
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner?
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/Robber (conflicts with Isaac)/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Paranormal Investigator / Robbed?
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - Drunk, Now Card 2
10. [f] Sawneeks - Witch / Check Card 2 and gave it to ???
11. [m] ynnek7 - Seer (conflicts with Include) / Checked Card 3 (Mason)
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now Insomniac

Changes to roles:
Rynam switched Faddy and Exmach.
Nicole took card 2
Sawneeks gave Card 2 to [redacted]
Either Isaac robbed Nomad (Robber -> PI) OR Faddy robbed DCPat (Robber -> Tanner)


Counterclaims:
Seer: Ynnek and Include
Villager: DCPat and Exmachina
Robber: Isaac and Faddy

We also need some clarifications from people who haven't shown back up yet.

I think we have Woofs in:
DCPat, Include, Isaac, Exmach, Faddy??, and Ynnek

There are also 3 Woofs, or 2 woofs and a Minion.

I only see two counter claims which means either a wolf or minion is in the middle or someone on the wolf team has went uncountered. I'm still uneasy about Sawneeks, she has been collating the info which is good in general but she is also withholding things which she can use to manipulate how people read the game. I'm still leaning that she is what she says.

For instance I am not clearing Lone_Prodigy, he waited until most claims were out and picked one that was available. I believe Nin but he is still on the table as a possible woof.

My thoughts right now are that the wolf team are Isaac and Include. The 3rd member is probably under the radar or in the middle. Isaac is most likely the mystic wolf with a real check on Nomad. Include feels too obvious.

I think Nomad's reluctance to claim what he did probably means he ran into a wolf or tanner because he could just say any of the "confirmed" claims out there right now if he was faking his PI claim.
 

Isaac

Oh, yeah!
I claimed first. I am quite incredulous right now on how Faddy is dancing his charade right now, so this is what it feels like when you know someone is flat out lying.
 

exmachina64

You can call me Deus
Why isn't exmachina claiming Robber now?
I have no idea what’s going on.

If I’m actually a tanner now, my goal is to die? Not killing me would be the simple way to solve that, but I understand that makes me seem more like a werewolf. I doubt Rynam’s Troublemaker claim and if there was only one villager, DCPat wasn’t it.
 
Okay. I was the tanner, not villager.

I wanted to create some suspicion towards me for conflicting with Machina.

Seeing as I can now confirm Faddy as robber and Machina as normal townie. I'll have to come clean now. Doesn't really matter as I was robbed anyways
 

Isaac

Oh, yeah!
Faddy and DCPat,
Both aren't cool cats
They both lie
They're wolves and should die

So in what world could there be two robbers in this game?
 

Isaac

Oh, yeah!
Counterclaims:
Seer: Ynnek and Include
Villager: DCPat and Exmachina
Robber: Isaac and Faddy
See, three counterclaims, three baddies. Faddy is connecting his claim to DCPat. I used my role on Nomadic Sparks. Nomadic Sparks isn't being counterclaimed. Checkmate, werewolves.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Isaac why are you fake voting for me? If you know I'm lying you vote for exmachina. Unless you think Rynam is lying for some reason?

I have no reason to lie. If I was a wolf I am not now. Why don't I just out and push on exmachina for the easy win?

Your whole defense is that you claimed early and confirmed with nomad but if you are the mystic wolf you get a check anyway so it doesn't prove anything. Why did you rob nomad, learn he was the PI and never push for him to claim his checks?
 

Isaac

Oh, yeah!
Isaac why are you fake voting for me? If you know I'm lying you vote for exmachina. Unless you think Rynam is lying for some reason?

I have no reason to lie. If I was a wolf I am not now. Why don't I just out and push on exmachina for the easy win?

Your whole defense is that you claimed early and confirmed with nomad but if you are the mystic wolf you get a check anyway so it doesn't prove anything. Why did you rob nomad, learn he was the PI and never push for him to claim his checks?
I robbed his role. His role is useless anymore.
 

Isaac

Oh, yeah!
@Faddy you claim to have an original role of Robber. My rolecard is Robber. Unless shenanigans were already at play influencing one of us to have a fake role that appears to one of us as real, my role is the real Robber role and that for me is enough to know that you're not who you're claiming to be, and my vote goes to you. So yeah.
 

Pedro

The Last Airbender is actually a great movie
Just an update, the Day will end in:
tur_1522530000.png
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
@Faddy you claim to have an original role of Robber. My rolecard is Robber. Unless shenanigans were already at play influencing one of us to have a fake role that appears to one of us as real, my role is the real Robber role and that for me is enough to know that you're not who you're claiming to be, and my vote goes to you. So yeah.

So you are pushing the world where me Rynam and probably exmachina are partners?

Actually not exmachina since DCPat has claimed Tanner, so I would need to be with Rynam definitely and either ynnek or Include.
 

Ynnek7

OH MY GOD, THEY LYNCHED YNNEK
I was hoping we'd hear from the other mason to confirm that I looked at card 3. Maybe then we could figure out why Include was claiming Apprentice Seer.

Gonna be pretty annoyed if cards 1 and 3 were both masons, lol.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Well we know both mason cards are in the middle unless someone is fake claiming and is actually the mason. In that situation it would be Sawneeks or Nin imo.
 
Hmm... I'm not sure who I am going to vote for yet. I have some notion that Sawneeks claim is fake.

My allegations should on negate, hers.

But I'm obviously voting for Ynnek7 since I know for fact that he is a liar and not creating gambits.

You all the rest of the townies should read back the topic and note the time line and context, scums are pretty obvious imo.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
Since Include likely won't move first, Card 2 is Mason and I gave it to Nomad.

My allegations should on negate, hers.

But I'm obviously voting for Ynnek7 since I know for fact that he is a liar and not creating gambits.

You all the rest of the townies should read back the topic and note the time line and context, scums are pretty obvious imo.
lol, please.

I tag Include as the Minion bait. Openly in your face and antagonizing another player that could easily backfire.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
1. [f] Include - Seer (conflicts with Ynnek) / looked at Card 2
2. [m] DCPat - Villager (conflicts with Exmac)
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber (Conflicts with Faddy), Stole Nomad
5. [m] nin (nin1000) - Revealer. Forgot action.
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner?
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/Robber (conflicts with Isaac)/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Paranormal Investigator / Robbed?
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - Drunk, Now Card 2
10. [f] Sawneeks - Witch / Check Card 2 and gave it to ???
11. [m] ynnek7 - Seer (conflicts with Include) / Checked Card 3 (Mason)
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now Insomniac

Changes to roles:
Rynam switched Faddy and Exmach.
Nicole took card 2
Sawneeks gave Card 2 to [redacted]
Either Isaac robbed Nomad (Robber -> PI) OR Faddy robbed DCPat (Robber -> Tanner)


Counterclaims:
Seer: Ynnek and Include
Villager: DCPat and Exmachina
Robber: Isaac and Faddy

We also need some clarifications from people who haven't shown back up yet.

I think we have Woofs in:
DCPat, Include, Isaac, Exmach, Faddy??, and Ynnek

There are also 3 Woofs, or 2 woofs and a Minion.


----

Woofs are likely: DCPat
Minion: Include
???: Faddy

I don't trust Faddy as far as I can throw him and he's so tangled in Tanners that i don't know anymore.
 

exmachina64

You can call me Deus
1. [f] Include - Seer (conflicts with Ynnek) / looked at Card 2
2. [m] DCPat - Villager (conflicts with Exmac)
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber (Conflicts with Faddy), Stole Nomad
5. [m] nin (nin1000) - Revealer. Forgot action.
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner?
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/Robber (conflicts with Isaac)/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Paranormal Investigator / Robbed?
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - Drunk, Now Card 2
10. [f] Sawneeks - Witch / Check Card 2 and gave it to ???
11. [m] ynnek7 - Seer (conflicts with Include) / Checked Card 3 (Mason)
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now Insomniac

Changes to roles:
Rynam switched Faddy and Exmach.
Nicole took card 2
Sawneeks gave Card 2 to [redacted]
Either Isaac robbed Nomad (Robber -> PI) OR Faddy robbed DCPat (Robber -> Tanner)


Counterclaims:
Seer: Ynnek and Include
Villager: DCPat and Exmachina
Robber: Isaac and Faddy

We also need some clarifications from people who haven't shown back up yet.

I think we have Woofs in:
DCPat, Include, Isaac, Exmach, Faddy??, and Ynnek

There are also 3 Woofs, or 2 woofs and a Minion.


----

Woofs are likely: DCPat
Minion: Include
???: Faddy

I don't trust Faddy as far as I can throw him and he's so tangled in Tanners that i don't know anymore.
Are you just not updating your list now or...?
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
1. [f] Include - Seer (conflicts with Ynnek) / looked at Card 2
2. [m] DCPat - Villager (conflicts with Exmac) / claims Tanner
3. [m] Rynam - Troublemaker: Switched Faddy and Exmach
4. [m] Oliver James (Isaac): Robber (Conflicts with Faddy), Stole Nomad (PI)
5. [m] nin (nin1000) - Revealer. Forgot action.
6. [m] exmachina64 - Villager (conflicts with DCPat) / Now Tanner?
7. [m] Faddy - Was Tanner/Robber (conflicts with Isaac)/ now Villager??
8. [m] Comrade Sparkster (Nomad Sparkster) - Paranormal Investigator / Robbed?
9. [f] Sweet Nicole - Drunk, Now Card 2
10. [f] Sawneeks - Witch / Check Card 2 (Mason) and gave it to Nomad
11. [m] ynnek7 - Seer (conflicts with Include) / Checked Card 3 (Mason)
12. [m] Lone_Prodigy - Insomniac / now Insomniac

Changes to roles:
Rynam switched Faddy and Exmach.
Nicole took card 2 (PI or Robber)
Sawneeks gave Card 2 (Mason) to Nomad
Either Isaac robbed Nomad (Robber -> PI) OR Faddy robbed DCPat (Robber -> Tanner)

Counterclaims:
Seer: Ynnek and Include
Villager: DCPat and Exmachina
Robber: Isaac and Faddy
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
''cleared'' people, aka no counterclaims:

Rynam - Troublemaker
Nin - Revealer
Nomad - PI
Nicole - Drunk
Sawneeks - Witch
LP - Insomniac

Questionable individuals:
Include - Seer who checked Card 2
DCPat - Claimed Villager and then Tanner
Isaac - Claimed Robber. Stole Nomad's PI card
Exmach - claimed Villager
Faddy - Claimed Tanner, then claimed Robber who stole DCPat's Tanner card
Ynnek - Seer who checked Card 3 (Mason)
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
Some stuff I'm finding real iffy here:

-Include and her whole shtick going after me.
-DCPat doubling back on his Villager claim once Faddy said he was Tanner
-Faddy's entire Robber claim

and if anything, Exmach and Faddy are switched. If either of you are lying now is the time to actually clear it up so we can figure out who to vote for.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Sawneeks I don't understand your logic here. Am I wolf with DCPat? Or am I the mystic wolf who investigated him, leaving him with his tanner card?

In either case I don't see how we can be partners. Do you doubt Rynam? Do you doubt exmachina? If you doubt neither then you should know I am town. Then why would I lie? It is an easy win to just out myself and we all vote exmachina.

Isaac isn't the robber, he is probably the mystic wolf.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
Day ends in 40, where is everyone??

I moved before you did, check my awesome breadcrumb.



Take the first letter of each word, also note that tagged Nicole who I believed had it (since I thought you were lying).

Well, that should confirm me as Seer and you as witch.

....okay, I'll admit. That's a great breadcrumb.

Sawneeks I don't understand your logic here. Am I wolf with DCPat? Or am I the mystic wolf who investigated him, leaving him with his tanner card?

In either case I don't see how we can be partners. Do you doubt Rynam? Do you doubt exmachina? If you doubt neither then you should know I am town. Then why would I lie? It is an easy win to just out myself and we all vote exmachina.

Isaac isn't the robber, he is probably the mystic wolf.

Hm. Now that I am thinking about it I may be leaning towards the latter. Still unsure, there's a lot here I can't make sense of.

I don't doubt Ry, he has not backed down nor been counterclaimed. I believe he did switch you both. I am unsure of Exmach since he's been quiet and may be waiting to see if Ry backs down.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
''cleared'' people, aka no counterclaims:

Rynam - Troublemaker
Nin - Revealer
Nomad - PI
Nicole - Drunk
Sawneeks - Witch
LP - Insomniac

Questionable individuals:
Include - Seer who checked Card 2
DCPat - Claimed Villager and then Tanner
Isaac - Claimed Robber. Stole Nomad's PI card
Exmach - claimed Villager
Faddy - Claimed Tanner, then claimed Robber who stole DCPat's Tanner card
Ynnek - Seer who checked Card 3 (Mason)

ASSUMING Faddy and Include are both truthful:

Faddy robbed DCPat's Tanner card. Ry switches Faddy (Tanner) with Exmach (Villager). Faddy is now Villager, DCPat is now Robber, and Exmach is Tanner.
Include is the real Apprentice Seer and checked Card 2, verified by Sawneeks who gave that card to Nomad. Nomad is now Mason.
Nicole is Drunk and Drunk pulls Card 2, becoming PI.
Isaac is Mystic Wolf/Woof.
Ynnek lied a guessed on Card 3? (which I find odd to get the Mason right)

ASSUMING Faddy and Include are lying:

Faddy and Exmach are switched by Ry. Exmach is now Woof, Faddy is now Villager.
Isaac is Robber and robs Nomad's PI Card. Isaac is now PI, Nomad is now Robber.
I check card 2 and give it to Nomad. Nomad is now Mason and Card 2 is now Robber.
Nicole is still drunk and becomes Robber with Card 2
Ynnek checked Card 3 which was the other Mason.
Faddy would be Mystic Wolf
Include is Minion?
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
My one hesitation is Ynnek guessing correctly on Card 3 being the other Mason. The one reason I held off so long on what Card 2 was is because I was waiting for someone to claim solo Mason so I could verify them. The fact that Ynnek said it was Card 3 leaves me feeling he is being truthful because that's one hell of a guess to bank on if a Woof.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
Let me say this:

If the Day ends and Faddy does not back away from his Robber claim despite being Switched, vote for Isaac. Faddy would no longer be his original card in this scenario and would win with Town. If he was a Woof to start he would lose if he didn't come clean. If he sticks to his guns then he is Town and Isaac is a liar. If he backs down then it's Exmach.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
My one hesitation is Ynnek guessing correctly on Card 3 being the other Mason. The one reason I held off so long on what Card 2 was is because I was waiting for someone to claim solo Mason so I could verify them. The fact that Ynnek said it was Card 3 leaves me feeling he is being truthful because that's one hell of a guess to bank on if a Woof.

You did soft that you knew the masons earlier when I asked if anyone thought Include and LP were masons and you immediately ruled it out. I don't think there is any real possibility you are a wolf now.

So what is the unknown card in the centre? A wolf or the minion?
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
Kill me, I guess? If I’m the Tanner, I’ll win.

Tanner wins are my favorite....

:p
You did soft that you knew the masons earlier when I asked if anyone thought Include and LP were masons and you immediately ruled it out. I don't think there is any real possibility you are a wolf now.

So what is the unknown card in the centre? A wolf or the minion?

It would have to be a Wolf or Minion as Card 1 unless one of the uncontested claims (Drunk, Insomniac) were just really lucky Woofs.
 
What a sad end of day and game... Sad not see the frenzy of the usual games.

Anyhow my vote is not gonna change I'm banking on the low profile but very much confirmed liar yneek7.

@Sawneeks I bet Ynnek7 would have said whatever the heck he wanted and you will still have doubts about me, which in all honesty defy logic since I claimed before him and know the correct card but it's alright I'm sure my push on you must have traumatized you :p
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
What a sad end of day and game... Sad not see the frenzy of the usual games.

Anyhow my vote is not gonna change I'm banking on the low profile but very much confirmed liar yneek7.

@Sawneeks I bet Ynnek7 would have said whatever the heck he wanted and you will still have doubts about me, which in all honesty defy logic since I claimed before him and know the correct card but it's alright I'm sure my push on you must have traumatized you :p

Are you worried ynnek7 is the minion? I mean if we believe nomad then Isaac knew his role which puts him solidly as the mystic wolf.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
What a sad end of day and game... Sad not see the frenzy of the usual games.

Anyhow my vote is not gonna change I'm banking on the low profile but very much confirmed liar yneek7.

@Sawneeks I bet Ynnek7 would have said whatever the heck he wanted and you will still have doubts about me, which in all honesty defy logic since I claimed before him and know the correct card but it's alright I'm sure my push on you must have traumatized you :p
Having votes be hidden after it ends leaves a lot of extra time. Frenzy doesn't happen in ONUW sadly. :<

and you keep saying that. Not my fault you kept ignoring my questions and turning it back on me. :p

It would be better to coordinate votes though. With how quiet this is it may be easy for the wolves to jump on a single vote if everything is spread out so much.
 
Are you worried ynnek7 is the minion? I mean if we believe nomad then Isaac knew his role which puts him solidly as the mystic wolf.

I'm having trouble with the conflicts you guys are having, I'm not honestly sure which one of you is lying and to be frank my reasoning of the wolf being low profile still stands. I am banking on Ynnek7, minus conter claiming me he hasn't done anything good at all and just stayed on the side line, I don't think it's what minion will do.

Having votes be hidden after it ends leaves a lot of extra time. Frenzy doesn't happen in ONUW sadly. :<

and you keep saying that. Not my fault you kept ignoring my questions and turning it back on me. :p

It would be better to coordinate votes though. With how quiet this is it may be easy for the wolves to jump on a single vote if everything is spread out so much.

I don't trust scum needs, she is way too good at what she does but hey I claimed my role without having to, I wasn't in danger or problem, I said the card was town and decided to reveal at the correct time. What else do you want woman? I played it safe for the sake of town, can you imagine if you were wold and gave you everything on platter?

Nah I played as best as I could in my opinion and I stand by my choices.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
REMINDER:
Let me say this:

If the Day ends and Faddy does not back away from his Robber claim despite being Switched, vote for Isaac. Faddy would no longer be his original card in this scenario and would win with Town. If he was a Woof to start he would lose if he didn't come clean. If he sticks to his guns then he is Town and Isaac is a liar. If he backs down then it's Exmach.

VOTE ISAAC OR EXMACH DEPENDING ON WHAT FADDY CLAIMS.
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Waited till the last minute in case Rynam screwed me. I was a Woof.

Vote for exmachina.
 

Pedro

The Last Airbender is actually a great movie
THE DAY IS OVER

You now have 24 hours to send me a PM with your votes. I'll post the results here as soon as I get everyone's votes.
 
I'm having trouble with the conflicts you guys are having, I'm not honestly sure which one of you is lying and to be frank my reasoning of the wolf being low profile still stands. I am banking on Ynnek7, minus conter claiming me he hasn't done anything at all and just stayed on the side line, I don't think it's what minion will do.



I don't trust scumneeks , she is way too good at what she does but hey I claimed my role without having to, I wasn't in danger or problem, I said the card was town and decided to reveal at the correct time. What else do you want woman? I played it safe for the sake of town, can you imagine if you were a wolf and gave you everything on platter?

Nah I played it as best as I could in my opinion and I stand by my choices.

Fixed
 

Pedro

The Last Airbender is actually a great movie
Time's up, and the game is over!

Fiiiirst, the original roles and your night actions:
  • Faddy was the Mystic Wolf, he learned that SweetNicole was the Drunk.
  • Include was the Apprentice Seer, she looked at Card 2.
  • Nomad Sparkster was the Paranormal Investigator, but he didn't send a night action.
  • Isaac was the Robber, he traded his role with Nomad Sparkster.
  • Sawneeks was the Witch, she swapped Card 2 with Nomad Sparkster.
  • Rynam was the Troublemaker, he switched exmachina64 with Faddy.
  • SweetNicole was the Drunk, she swapped herself with Card 2.
  • Lone_Prodigy was the Insomniac, he learned he was still the Insomniac.
  • nin1000 was the Revealer, but he didn't send a night action.
  • DCPAT was the Dream Wolf.
  • exmachina64 was the Villager.
  • Ynnek7 was the Tanner.
  • Card 1 was the Minion.
  • Card 2 was the Mason.
  • Card 3 was the Mason.
At the end of the night, these were your roles (changes in bold):
  • exmachina64 was the Mystic Wolf.
  • Include was the Apprentice Seer
  • Isaac was the Paranormal Investigator.
  • SweetNicole was the Robber.
  • Sawneeks was the Witch.
  • Rynam was the Troublemaker.
  • Card 2 was the Drunk.
  • Lone_Prodigy was the Insomniac.
  • nin1000 was the Revealer.
  • DCPAT was the Dream Wolf.
  • Faddy was the Villager.
  • Ynnek7 was the Tanner.
  • Card 1 was the Minion.
  • Nomad Sparkster was the Mason.
  • Card 3 was the Mason.

And finally, the results:

exmachina64 (5 votes)
Lone_Prodigy, Sawneeks, SweetNicole, Faddy, Rynam

Ynnek7 (2 votes)
Include, Ynnek7

Sawneeks (1 vote)
exmachina64

Faddy (1 vote)
Isaac

Isaac (1 vote)
DCPAT

nin1000 and Nomad Sparkster didn't vote either.

exmachina64, the Mystic Wolf, has been eliminated! He was aligned with the Werewolves.
The Village fulfilled its win condition and won the game! Congratulations!


giphy.gif
 
Last edited:

Ynnek7

OH MY GOD, THEY LYNCHED YNNEK
I was counting on the odds of two masons being out there to call me out on my lie, lol.

Plus, once someone claimed Tanner, I wanted to stay as far away from that as possible.

Thank you for the vote, Include!
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
Ffs. Thanks Faddy for giving me a chance tho. Would've been great if you wasn't been swapped

I didn't want to bury us if Rynam was lying. And coming out right away would have ruined the game. Gotta work for it.
 

Pedro

The Last Airbender is actually a great movie
Thanks @Pedro for hosting!! <3

You, and the others, are welcome c:

I was surprised to see both Masons in the center, and even more so when Ynnek correctly guessed Card 3 :D

This was a short and casual game, and a new experience to many here, and I hope you enjoyed it!
 
Last edited:

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
You, and the others, are welcome c:

I was surprised to see both Masons in the center, and even more so when Yneek correctly guessed Card 3 :D

This was a short and casual game, and a new experience to many here, and I hope you enjoyed it!

I had a great time. Thanks Pedro.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
You, and the others, are welcome c:

I was surprised to see both Masons in the center, and even more so when Yneek correctly guessed Card 3 :D

This was a short and casual game, and a new experience to many here, and I hope you enjoyed it!

...............

..............

holy shit, great guess Ynnek. Sorry Include. :<
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
...............

..............

holy shit, great guess Ynnek. Sorry Include. :<

Did you enjoy working for the win?

At one point I was kind of thinking you were the minion with the eary friendly banter with both me and DCPat. I thought you were going to claim you swapped exmachina with a wolf.
 
@Rynam is the real MVP with his switch.
That was just luck tho. :D If you two names wouldn't have been in the middle of the playerlist i would've switched someone else. :D (yeah that was my thought in choosing my switching target, the names that were in the middle next to eachother)
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
@Sawneeks why should I be voted out if Faddy didn't change his claim?

Because if I was a wolf I would claim so I win as town. Which is what happened. You win or lose based on your final card, not your original one.

I guess the one world town lose to is me claiming wolf if I was the minion and exmachina was a wolf.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
Did you enjoy working for the win?

At one point I was kind of thinking you were the minion with the eary friendly banter with both me and DCPat. I thought you were going to claim you swapped exmachina with a wolf.

Very much. It's kinda like normal mafia games where getting the results/flip is fun but digging into the nitty-gritty of the game is what gets me to keep playing over and over. I'm very grateful you let it run its' course. :p

lol, that would have been great if I was the Minion. I just take these a little more relaxed so early-game banter is kinda normal.

@Rynam is the real MVP with his switch.

^^^^

@Sawneeks why should I be voted out if Faddy didn't change his claim?

Because if I was a wolf I would claim so I win as town. Which is what happened. You win or lose based on your final card, not your original one.

I guess the one world town lose to is me claiming wolf if I was the minion and exmachina was a wolf.

^^

Faddy was no longer his original card so he had everything to lose if he was a Wolf and didn't claim and only one of you could be Robber.

Also Faddy that thought did cross my mind at one point but the probability of that happened seemed WAY too low to really let it be a factor.
 

Isaac

Oh, yeah!
Yup. If Faddy hadn't been switched then he would have had no reason to clear up his lie.
I guess I was just being a bit bitter thinking that you were believing Faddy's claim over mine because he's been around here for much longer than I was.
 

Sawneeks

little green dog
I guess I was just being a bit bitter thinking that you were believing Faddy's claim over mine because he's been around here for much longer than I was.
Oh no! That was not it at all, I'm so sorry Isaac. ;;

The thing with ONUW is to follow with what can be confirmed since roles/alignments change so much instead of just straight claims since we only have one shot with a vote. Being around longer or not didn't have anything to do with the decision, I would've believed you in a heartbeat if there was any way to confirm it.
 
I never trusted Faddy even with his confession, he lied way too much throughout the game. I was like '' eh, maybe he is the minion and keeping Ynnek7 safe'', nice game Ynnek7.

@Sawneeks you really were traumatized huh? The thing is I read the previous game where you pretended to be the trouble maker and I was scared of you, truth be told you have that power of controlling the game and gathering informations while giving nothing away yourself, I didn't want to play into that :p but once you gave Card 2 I trusted you.

@Pedro I told you before but gonna tell you again, thanks for hosting the game.

Also everyone else, congratulations and thank you for playing. It was fun :)
 

Faddy

of, having, or involving transitory whims
I guess I was just being a bit bitter thinking that you were believing Faddy's claim over mine because he's been around here for much longer than I was.

I had a plan coming into the day phase that I was always going to claim robber, it didn't really matter who had the card. I told Pedro in a PM too. So I wasn't picking on a newer player. If anything I hesitated to counter you because you seemed so unlikely to be lying, but you would need to if you rolled wolf so I just projected my own plan onto you.
 

Isaac

Oh, yeah!
Oh no! That was not it at all, I'm so sorry Isaac. ;;

The thing with ONUW is to follow with what can be confirmed since roles/alignments change so much instead of just straight claims since we only have one shot with a vote. Being around longer or not didn't have anything to do with the decision, I would've believed you in a heartbeat if there was any way to confirm it.
Yeah, I know, it was my fault. Sorry. It was all clear when you mentioned the switch Rynam did, that is logical :)

I had a plan coming into the day phase that I was always going to claim robber, it didn't really matter who had the card. I told Pedro in a PM too. So I wasn't picking on a newer player. If anything I hesitated to counter you because you seemed so unlikely to be lying, but you would need to if you rolled wolf so I just projected my own plan onto you.
I understand that you need to do everything to win, it's just that I thought incorrectly that Sawneeks was picking your claim over mine unsubstantiated, but that isn't the case.

We all won in the end, that's the important thing :)
 
Top Bottom