That's rich.Why the little work then?
If it's generally accepted here to think coasting can be scummy, you can bet that I think that doing it deliberately looks extremely scummy to me. A vote "based on a feeling" my ass.All you did on me was a vote based on a feeling and when I did respond to your tiny pole, you just cowered down. Is this how we should treat Mafia, oh no, just let them be. And certainly you are not saying that you spent the entire day on getting attached to my fluff so much that you forgot that there are 8 other people (that you mentioned) instead that could be Mafia?
That's rich.
If it's generally accepted here to think coasting can be scummy, you can bet that I think that doing it deliberately looks extremely scummy to me. A vote "based on a feeling" my ass.
That's rich.
If it's generally accepted here to think coasting can be scummy, you can bet that I think that doing it deliberately looks extremely scummy to me. A vote "based on a feeling" my ass.
Put me in the team who disagrees with this take (if there is one), I don't think it's unreasonable to imagine that Carl and scum-mate saw there was an appetite for a Michael exclusion and hedged their bets (especially when Ken was going to be a prime chopping block target the next day regardless), thinking a new player could be saved for later (by either pocketing them or through a ME).Asuka said:Also, for everyone voting Carl, if he is scum then Tommy is the other scum. That's the only way those votes make sense because Carl never took the easy boost vote on Carl to tip him over Ken which solves
most of the scum team's issue earlier. The only reason a scum Carl doesn't do that is if Tommy is scum too.
The issue with that though is roleblocker is the strongest mafia role in this set up and voting Tommy, who would either be a goon or a godfather, would be better than losing Ken to a day 1 vote.
Yep, definitely trolling.Let's be serious. That's rich is you just deflecting. And the rest is you sidestepping the issue that you, seemingly, did nothing during D1.
I found the take pretty interesting and am definitely not in agreement with it because, even though I have Tommy as a light suspect, I am leaning more towards newbie Town than newbie Scum currently.Put me in the team who disagrees with this take (if there is one), I don't think it's unreasonable to imagine that Carl and scum-mate saw there was an appetite for a Michael exclusion and hedged their bets (especially when Ken was going to be a prime chopping block target the next day regardless), thinking a new player could be saved for later (by either pocketing them or through a ME).
This also only seems to serve the purpose of soft-discouraging a Carl exclusion for both Tommy and me (as I've said I currently lean town on him), I find that this kind of post is generally saved for when we know one of their alignments to help us get a read on the other
Both of you could have technically done it, with scum you being afraid of appearing scummy by switching votes too late (especially if you are indeed a new player) and Roman having just go their at the end hasn't had the time to read the thread or put down reasoning and chose through 'luck' to put their vote on scum. But this is very much WIFOM so I'm not willing to consider it as a scummy move but I wouldn't give Roman town points for it.TommyV said:Just to try and keep our eyes on every possible angle and go for big hypotheticals...Is there a point in time where Michael is a guaranteed enough kill
for Day 1 that scum would hide their votes in Ken because they knew they knew he was safe, and they could use him as a blanket? "See, I voted for Ken!" If I were scum, I would do something like this,
especially if I saw how the tides were going, and/or if I knew I had other scum to finish pushing Michael over the edge. In this case, that would be: TommyV and Roman.
Ken's attitude was very much his modus operandi so I don't think this can be used as a defence, if it was it would green check faaaaaaaaaaaar too many players (including me :3)TommyV said:For those on the fence about me, I'm not sure if this will sway you much, but Ken got a little snippy with me because I called him out for hardly making posts.
You'd think that is something I'd be yelling at him behind-the-scenes about. Of course, this could be a smoke screen, or we could just be a terrible team.
But I was genuinely frustrated someone might absorb all the votes and let real scum slide because he wouldn't defend himself. Luckily enough,
it was his act of defending himself afterwards (by getting snippy) that cemented it for me that he was scum, along with his vote against me then quick flip to Michael.
I like this and I'll take it into consideration.I think you're missing a middle ground. I am suspicious of you, I did push you, but I am not actively pushing you at the moment (outside of my vote, which I guess you can count as a push). You are still my top pick, but I like all your responses so far. You can just be an even-keeled, logical person who handles pressure well and still be scum though. However, I want to point out that since my immediate drop on you beginning of Day 2, I have been looking down other avenues as well. I think it's important to not get tunnel-vision on you, which is why I've questioned Catalina (who I feel comfortable with now) and Claude (who I'm also more comfortable with, but still not 100%). I've since started going down other avenues as well. Even with you as my top pick, I do not want to start a train on you, because that makes it too easy for scum to hop on board and hide amongst the townies. If people are going to vote scum on you, I want it to be because they believe it, and not because they are just following a wave.
I wish I could.
I think I would my game would be served better with an earlier vote rather than a later one.
I'm one of those guys that like to go to every single store before making up my mind on what to buy... so that's why I tend to vote so late. But that has come back and bitten me in the ass numerous times.
I like what Asuka has posted today (hasn't completely absolved me, but she's reasoning it out and not going for a straight condemnation like others).
Catalina, you're giving me a hard time. I agree with what has been said about your Michael vote. But the fact that you don't have a vote on me means that you're not completely dismissive of my explanation. I hope you keep an open mind. That's why I'm not voting for you right now.
It was mostly how he jumped on the Michael train. Lance was town. I know I'm town. The next two votes tend to be scum, to solidify the train: Ken and Asuka.
But I've since changed my mind, like i mentioned earlier in this post. I'm now leaning town on him.
I'm okay with a TommyV vote. You were the first vote on me, but I'm leaning town on you, so I understand that you are suspicious. I know I would be.
But Tommy came in hard after that, and I don't have a good read on him in general. I think he felt he came close to getting lynched on the previous day and wants to quickly set up someone to lynch on D2 before eyes turn back to him. I'am also suspicious of Huang because the third vote is the one that tries to solidify a train going. I'd also be suspicious of whoever votes after Huang.
So, let me put this in here right now, with the caveat that it's not set in stone and I am willing to change my mind - hopefully not at the last minute.
VOTE: TommyV
Put me in the team who disagrees with this take (if there is one), I don't think it's unreasonable to imagine that Carl and scum-mate saw there was an appetite for a Michael exclusion and hedged their bets (especially when Ken was going to be a prime chopping block target the next day regardless), thinking a new player could be saved for later (by either pocketing them or through a ME).
This also only seems to serve the purpose of soft-discouraging a Carl exclusion for both Tommy and me (as I've said I currently lean town on him), I find that this kind of post is generally saved for when we know one of their alignments to help us get a read on the other
Exclusion is the word some people are using instead of lynch, ME means misexclude ect (they're currently using it in 999 mafia)Asuka said:I don’t understand the second paragraph when you say a “Carl Exclusion”
In the Space Mafia I have in my mind, I'll use "jettison" instead of lynch.Do people here want to use exclude instead of lynch? I'm sure I'll slip up occasionally, but don't mind trying.
We could always use 'send him to sleep with the fishes".Do people here want to use exclude instead of lynch? I'm sure I'll slip up occasionally, but don't mind trying.
There's a difference between attitude and the willingness to solve the game. Side-eye from me excusing it like that.although the attitude might rub some people the wrong way, attitude is not indicative of alignment.
Words like that are what got me into my predicament.Claude/Catalina feels like a random bit of nothing to me.
I also don’t know what to make of that Claude/Catalina fight. It feels like there are so many feints in there that neither of you are even taking the conversation seriously.
← 100% seriousness.
I like them records so I'll mention that I was serious as well.
I might not have been super clear on what I meant so just to break it down further. I think one or both of you could have been serious in that little tiff, but at the end, all I feel is that you talked past each other for most of it and it could have been artificial very easily so, like Trevor, it changed nothing for me on either of you.
Do you think you could expand on that Asuka read a bit? Anything in particular sticking out?TOWN:
Trevor???
Huang?????? (I'm feeling much better after the results of the poking and prodding)
NULL:
Claude
SCUM:
Catalina
Asuka
Carl
Do you think you could expand on that Asuka read a bit? Anything in particular sticking out?
Thank you.Aha. A probe for further information. Of course, that only made sense in this twisted game of ours.
"Something about the style of their participation, both D1 and D2, has been bugging me. It's a very hit-and-run style of play. There's something off about the tone of their engagement. I don't have anything too specific to put my finger on, however."
Thank you.
I must also point out, of course, that you did not include either Tommy or Franklin in there. No thoughts on them?
Ok, so your Scum list has Catalina, Asuka, Carl, and Tommy. Is there an order to that? One you want to see today over the others?"I merely forgot to include them. Franklin is null, Tommy is a scum lean."
Ok, so your Scum list has Catalina, Asuka, Carl, and Tommy. Is there an order to that? One you want to see today over the others?
Same, it was this game actually!I've been in situations before where Town almost lynched scum on D1 but didn't
Oh wait, I might have misread that, you're talking about Ken there, I thought you were talking about Tommy almost getting taken out on D1. My bad haha.
Oh wait, I might have misread that, you're talking about Ken there, I thought you were talking about Tommy almost getting taken out on D1. My bad haha.
Ah, ok then. So who would the third be in this world, or have you not thought that out yet? Asuka has a possible Carl + Tommy pairing based on this idea I believe, are you going down that road too?"Nope, I mean a game before this. A game before this where there were two scum on the chopping block and they deflected to a third target."
Who would you put in this category? Just Tommy? I mean, as far as I can tell, most of the room is Scum reading you in some way. Some players don't have votes on you, but have expressed interest in it still.Please look at those actively pushing to get me excluded. I swear that’s where you’ll find scum.
It's not just because you voted for Michael. You also never expressed interest in a Ken vote during the day, and definitely soft defended him at times, which have all been brought up. That sets you apart from other Michael voters to me.If you’re town and you voted for Michael, you made the same mistake as I did. Please don’t exclude me for this.
I’m torn about naming names cause I don’t want more votes on me right now. Someone might think, “oh, you think I’m scum, here’s a vote on you”.Who would you put in this category? Just Tommy? I mean, as far as I can tell, most of the room is Scum reading you in some way. Some players don't have votes on you, but have expressed interest in it still.
But that was just bad luck. I’ve never played scum, but if i did, I wouldn’t openly defend a team mate to save his hide.It's not just because you voted for Michael. You also never expressed interest in a Ken vote during the day, and definitely soft defended him at times, which have all been brought up. That sets you apart from other Michael voters to me.
As I said, most of the room believes you are Scum at this point anyways, I don't think you have anything to fear from naming people you think are Scum. That's what the rest of us are doing when we make read lists after all.I’m torn about naming names cause I don’t want more votes on me right now. Someone might think, “oh, you think I’m scum, here’s a vote on you”.
I’ve kinda implied some names in my previous posts, but I don’t want to get turbo’d while I’m asleep and without a chance to defend myself one last time.
Without specific elaboration on who you mean and why this just reads like you think they're scum because they're voting you.Please look at those actively pushing to get me excluded. I swear that’s where you’ll find scum.
If we're wrong and you have genuine arguments against some people who are voting you, just say who you mean and why. Chances that you get turboed aren't high, and being awfully concerned about it just reads extremely self-preservational to me.I’m torn about naming names cause I don’t want more votes on me right now. Someone might think, “oh, you think I’m scum, here’s a vote on you”.
I’ve kinda implied some names in my previous posts, but I don’t want to get turbo’d while I’m asleep and without a chance to defend myself one last time.
Definitely throw out names. We need all the help we can get, and if you're a townie, you can only help. Even if you don't convince the room, you're excluded, and we find out you're a townie? Well, you've got your thoughts out there that we can go back and look at in a possible new light. Our mistake can still turn positive as long as we can take something away from your death.I’m torn about naming names cause I don’t want more votes on me right now. Someone might think, “oh, you think I’m scum, here’s a vote on you”.
I’ve kinda implied some names in my previous posts, but I don’t want to get turbo’d while I’m asleep and without a chance to defend myself one last time.
@Asuka What are your current reads, if you have the time to write them down? I see you pointing out things I agree with every now and then, but I'm not completely sure how you stand on many people here.
Pretty much agreed on the Trevor and Franklin part, though in case of Trevor I don't think I'm very prone to see such signs, so it's mostly just a feeling that it could be possible, but not major.High levels reads, I suspect Catalina > Tommy > Trevor. Trevor is the only one in there I haven't talked about yet. That's mostly a conspiracy at this point. I see some of the tell tale signs of fake town leader but not enough for me to push it over more obvious suspects.
I think Huang and Franklin are town. Talked about Huang already. Franklin is mostly because I've like pretty much all of his posts.
To be honest past that, I'm middling on the rest, you especially are a complete blind spot to me at this point.
You wish.Trevor is the only one in there I haven't talked about yet. That's mostly a conspiracy at this point. I see some of the tell tale signs of fake town leader but not enough for me to push it over more obvious suspects.
Here is what she had on me in connection with Carl:What is your take on Carl though? You've connected him to Tommy, but said we should go Tommy first, right? I think you had a post saying that somewhere.
Also, for everyone voting Carl, if he is scum then Tommy is the other scum. That's the only way those votes make sense because Carl never took the easy boost vote on Carl to tip him over Ken which solves most of the scum team's issue earlier. The only reason a scum Carl doesn't do that is if Tommy is scum too. The issue with that though is roleblocker is the strongest mafia role in this set up and voting Tommy, who would either be a goon or a godfather, would be better than losing Ken to a day 1 vote.
Ok now that I'm done with my work. Yes, what Carl says above is what I was talking about @TommyV . Basically, scum Carl should always vote for you closer to mid day or if he's feeling frisky, he busses Ken. Neither happened there and instead he didn't get onto a wagon until Michael was starting to develop. I'm not sure I even buy Carl as scum because I think Catalina is one of the remaining but if it turns out he is then you have a high likelihood of being scum as well.
Yes, thanks. This was the other post I was thinking of, where he said he wanted you first:Here is what she had on me in connection with Carl:
Also, let’s be clear here, I brought up Carl specifically because he got a lot of traction out the gate today, I think Tommy is the better first lynch if people want to go down that rabbit hole because there was a lot of weirdness around why no one pushed Tommy further. To my point, I think scum Carl means scum Tommy but scum Tommy doesn’t necessarily mean scum Carl. A few people could be partnered with Tommy, you included.
Pretty much agreed on the Trevor and Franklin part, though in case of Trevor I don't think I'm very prone to see such signs, so it's mostly just a feeling that it could be possible, but not major.
What would be your reasons for scumreading Tommy at this stage? He was in the running yesterday for a time, but I've seen people change their stance and like his posts today a bit more.
I've considered that the room may have been reading Tommy as more of a newb than some of the others on D1, which may have caused people to be wary about voting there in general. Just a thought though, since I know that's why I kind of stopped scum reading him after a while.Same reason I've been saying all day, no one pushed Tommy over Ken when there was plenty of opportunity.
I could be wrong, but if I were in other people's shoes...I would've pushed for Ken over myself not because I thought TommyV wasn't a good choice, but simply because Ken stood out that much more. With Ken gone now, I can see how my Day 1 activities early on come off as suspicious. I'm a goofy personality in general, and genuinely thought a costume mafia involved role-playing. Then I got in this weird spot of one foot in and one foot out, then finally pulled myself out. In the early stages of Day 1, I was truly confused why people would be on me so much for being goofy with the punch jokes. During night while I was re-reading every post in order to scrutinize potential scum with the assumption that Ken was scum, I came to realize how every little thing we write really can be important, and that I should knock off the silly.Same reason I've been saying all day, no one pushed Tommy over Ken when there was plenty of opportunity.
Yeah, the more I've thought about this, it isn't entirely unheard of for something like that to go down. I had been thinking with votes in the air, and a small game, it's maybe risky, but distancing is always a good thing if there's a chance for it.That said, im not feeling particularity towny about Claud, more null than anything. It seems like most of the good graves hes in are because of his argument with Ken near D1s end, which i cant right put much stock in as it was pretty clear for a long time there that Kens goose was likely to be cooked, and its far from impossible that the exchange was fabricated. Just saying im not gonna go rushing to put him on a pedestal or nothing.
Eh may as well.
vote:Ken
Its smaller games that iv found this kinda thing more likely tbh, in particular a (i think?) Mini mafia from ages ago where two scum bussed the absolute shit outta each other on D2, and it left the survivor of it sailing free from the rest of the game.Yeah, the more I've thought about this, it isn't entirely unheard of for something like that to go down. I had been thinking with votes in the air, and a small game, it's maybe risky, but distancing is always a good thing if there's a chance for it.
it was the bit of the over-reactive defensiveness that i had read from Ken, compared to the absolute nothing i had on Michael at the time (thanks to missing a big portion of that day), normally i might not have really weighed in being so uninformed, but i had a decent enough D1 scum lean on Ken at the time that i would have rather cemented his lynch than leave it up to (again, from just my perspective) a total shot in the dark.Evening Roman! If I could hear your thoughts, I'm just curious what made you suspect Ken. I have a light suspicion you could've voted for Ken as a blanket when you were confident he wasn't going to go down, and your reasoning posted below was a bit indifferent.
Catalina, for one, and high on my list. Tommy afterwards. Huang, somewhat, but I don’t have a good read on him.Who would you put in this category? Just Tommy? I mean, as far as I can tell, most of the room is Scum reading you in some way. Some players don't have votes on you, but have expressed interest in it still.
Same reason I've been saying all day, no one pushed Tommy over Ken when there was plenty of opportunity.
it was the bit of the over-reactive defensiveness that i had read from Ken, compared to the absolute nothing i had on Michael at the time (thanks to missing a big portion of that day), normally i might not have really weighed in being so uninformed, but i had a decent enough D1 scum lean on Ken at the time that i would have rather cemented his lynch than leave it up to (again, from just my perspective) a total shot in the dark.
You still leaning towards Carl here today, Franklin? Anything from him change your mind at all?
i knew it would be close but there were still a few minutes left for the vote to swing toward Ken as i was hoping, or for me or anyone else present to prevent a tie if necessary, it only ended so soon after that due to deliberate tie-preventing hammering.Did you know the vote would be so close with yours added to Ken? I'm a bit concerned that you would push us closer to a tie at that point. OTOH, if you were scum, you probably could have no showed and gotten away with it as a replacement on D1.
it only ended so soon after that due to deliberate tie-preventing hammering.
Fucken ell your right, my memory of that had basically everything happening a few minutes earlier."Are you sure? Both of the tie prevention votes were during minute 59 of the final hour. Not exactly what I would call hammering."
i knew it would be close but there were still a few minutes left for the vote to swing toward Ken as i was hoping, or for me or anyone else present to prevent a tie if necessary, it only ended so soon after that due to deliberate tie-preventing hammering.
Also i have no idea what "OTOH" stands for, but yeah i probably could have just peaced out, but thats no fun at all.
This seemed like an honest callout and re-direct at Claude. Honest in that he knew Claude wasn't scum with him, and he was trying to cast suspicion. I think this means Claude is a townie.
Just quick vote analyzing by the by, if Michael is scum, Lance was doing some sketch as fuck bussing.
Just doing a quick check in but I’ll be back in like two hours. Both of my day start comments are now useless and one is probably mildly self-incriminating but whatever. The first: I tried to make a post near day end yesterday to the effect of “I could have swapped votes here to Ken and I thought about it but I am purposely posting here to say that I consciously decided to let Michael die here instead.” The two things around that are, it wouldn’t have matter since people piled on to Michael in the last 30 seconds to prevent a tie so my vote would have either caused the tie or not mattered and when I hit post, I was met with a thread locked message because they really got that closed right on the dot. Full disclosure is really the only reason I’m saying that at this point since I was very complicit in protecting a mafia there.
The second, and it’s a shame Lance died, because I was going to come in with the obvious that he was pretty much lock town, more so knowing Ken is mafia but even without that knowledge, mafia never switches votes there like he did even if it was town/town. Oh well.
This bit threw me off a lot at the time, as it seemed like less encouraging me "be an independent actor", and more telling me to shut up and vote for Ken despite lacking some fairly important context.Now, there are some later posts during the final minutes where Asuka encourages Roman to be an independent actor, but I wouldn't count that as a positive.