OK, so much have happened and I just got home and haven't caught up fully, however I read through the second event and what caught my eyes is the blood lust some have without questioning first why and who created that event and who would it benefit to? Why jump straight to voting while you had time to think first? Why so quick to sacrifice players you would not have lynched if it wasn't for this event?
For me, I really doubt Sorian made a forced event that may penalize us the most, like if both Melon and Splinter are town, we will be losing one of our own because the game runner feels like it? It's unfair! why do we even play a game if the game runner can just force the outcome? It doesn't make sense, it's hard enough to pin down scums as it is, no need for the game runner to rig it, so no I 100% don't think it's Sorian.
I think a player did it, most definitely a Villain. The timing is too convenient, like for us EU we would be at work, school...etc. and for the rest they may be sleeping. Best time to push their agenda and create a fake urgency and confusion.
The player who did this must have calculated it to get a free townie kill while people are too confused to make a good judgement, and if that person is part of the community for a long time then they know about Mel and splint rivalry and wanted to have fun with it methinks.
Anyway, something else bothered me is Geno guilt tripping and trying to push others to lynch. Let's remember that he seemed really mad that Vere may have chosen him and thus putting him in danger instead of risking 4 others (if I understand the event properly). Thus I feel like he find his life more valuable than the rest of us, he rather others dies no matter who as long as it's not him.
So congratulations Stuart, not only do you appear to be more town today by actually getting involved instead of complaining about probe votes but I also found someone scumier than you. Rest assured though, he is just few percentage higher than you in my scale.
No lynch is a mistake. You guys don't understand how much we can benefit from discussing a lynch.
Really? How is a manufactured thunderdome going to help us learn anything? This is not our community choice but most certainly an anti town, how would we learn from the voting behavior or reaction to voting them if we aren't the ones doing the actually choosing? How would we have players' interactions and content to look later on if we don't get the chance to?
You are trying to equate normal lynch (which takes place after 48h of content) that would provide with real time accurate data, to a manufactured event!
You all make arguments about why we shouldn't do a no lynch day 1 yet you chicken out when we have to vote between 2 people. This is a 50 player game, having a day 1 with 2 lynches will provide us more information and we can even discuss the first lynch. It's definitely worth lynching one of the 2.
Oh yeah, let's guilt trip others for not playing along in a fishy ass event, most likely created by an anti town. Yeah yeah. suuuuuure....
Let's pretend normal lynch and manufactured event is the same thing, you know what's it's called? It's called bad faith!
Vote: Geno